🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an global treaty created to protect women from violence, covering family violence, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in Riga this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring governments to establish laws and support services to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a major setback for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked broad protest both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a national appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since Turkey left the convention in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly return the bill for additional consideration if he has concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in our nation but across Europe," commented a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several EU nations
• The European treaty requires particular legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence similar debates in additional member states